In this final course reflection, I will be addressing
program standard 4 Content
Knowledge - The teacher uses content area
knowledge, learning standards, appropriate pedagogy and resources to design and
deliver curricula and instruction to impact student learning. Throughout this course, I have had the
opportunity to demonstrate my knowledge of my content area of health and fitness,
effectively utilize pedagogy, set instruction outcomes for myself and my
students, and design coherent instruction for learning activities and unit
structure. For example, as shown in figure 1, one of my first discussion posts
addresses assessing student prior knowledge.
In this learning activity, I had
the opportunity to research and discuss the importance of pre-assessments and three
different strategies that were practical for my instruction. As
concluded by Dochy, Segers and Buehl (1999), “Prior knowledge is indeed an
effective aid for learning new knowledge,” which supports, “current practice of
activating prior knowledge at the beginning of a learning process.” I was able
to translate my new understanding of assessing for prior knowledge in my
classroom tips assignment, lesson sequence write-up, and my instructional
practices at my current internship. I have found that assessing prior knowledge
has led to an increased application of student strengths and weaknesses in my
instructional activities. Reflecting
on my learning experiences in this course, I believe that I was able to
successfully show emerging competence on program standard 4.
Figure 1. Module 1 Discussion Post |
A quote shared by
the professor of this course that I found very valuable:
“If you have come
here to help me, you are wasting my time. But if you have come here because
your destiny is bound up with mine, then let us work together”
-Lila Watson,
South African Activist
Reference
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The
relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of
research on prior knowledge. Review of educational research, 69(2),
145-186.
No comments:
Post a Comment