In
this week’s post, I will describe a rubric to be used in a future unit with
attention to strengths and limitations. A rubric is a set of guidelines or
rules used for evaluating and grading students’ performance. For the content
area of health/fitness, on a daily basis, my mentor and I evaluate students based
on attendance, participation, behavior, fitness progress and skill development.
Currently, students assess themselves at the beginning and end of the semester
based on Figure 1. Prior to turning
in the rubric, a guardian must sign that they have read their student’s behavior
self-assessment. This sets a clear understanding of the expectations over the
course of the semester.
In
our lifestyle activities class, units last the duration of two weeks with a
pre-test in the beginning and post-test at the end. Students are only graded
based on their post-test scores for each unit. However, I believe that it would
be beneficial to implement a rubric in order to evaluate students’ unit performance.
In order to develop an effective rubric for a future unit, I will first consider
the following: 1) Students being involved
in creating the rubric. As stated by Shermis and Di Vesta (2011), “Students
must be brought into the process gradually and consistently. They should have a
part in developing the rubrics, and eventually there should be no mystery or
ambiguity regarding how the performance is to be judged” (p. 142). By involving
students in the process of developing a rubric, I will be able to assume that every
student understands what is to be learned during the unit and why each grade
was earned at the end of the unit. Also, this allows for me to ensure that the
rubric is written in a student-friendly language that communicates clear expectations.
2) Rubric categories and ratings. As indicated
by Shermis et al. (2011), “An effective means by which evaluators address
quality is to analyze the performance into its key subdomains
and assign
ratings to each performance dimension” (p. 133). Figure 2 presents a set of tennis skill categories (i.e. serving,
striking and teamwork) and progress rating scale for each category with
descriptions. By considering both 1 and 2, I believe that I will be able to
effectively develop a unit rubric in order to evaluate student progress and
performance. References
Game, Set and Match!
(2014, May 5). Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://pegraded.blogspot.com/2014_05_01_archive.html
Shermis, M. D., & J., D. V. (2011). Classroom
assessment in action. Lanham, MD: Rowman &
Littlefield.
No comments:
Post a Comment